I’m convinced that they were buying time since the day before the shutdown to doctor or clean the Epstein files.
My former boss, mentor is the lead parliamentarian expert in the House. He shut down the House a day before the actual government shutdown to avoid seating the 218th vote for the Epstein files. The House runs on a separate budget, so there was no reason for them to be out of session.
That’s desperation, and there had to be a reason besides mere delay.
I’m aware wherever there is power there are also people hungry to gain it and hold it.
As soon as I noticed the elimination of Civics studies had become a complete war against our Department of Education, I realized knowledge had become the #1
enemy of the powerful and those who seek more power.
I see the US as an active crime scene - always has been, and always will be. Expect ongoing battles forever.So glad you’re on our team. 👍🏼
Even though, the electronic snooping by our government is nothing new as we were warned by Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor back in 2013, each of us are being threatened by a new McCarthyism for our beliefs. Before Snowden issued his warning, I knew this was happening as I had read an article that stated the big telecoms were funneling all of the internet traffic to huge government server storage farms. While they didn't specify in that article, what the data being collected was to be used for, having been in IT for 30 years at that time, I knew exactly why they were collecting it.
Knowing what I know, and even using all of the commercially available software to protect myself, I do know that all the VPNs, encryption, antivirus, and malware software cannot protect me from the ability of the government and BigTech to 'fingerprint' any device used on the internet.
I realize it's sort of silly to cling to my pseudonym, SpudLink, but hey, it's my security blanket, and I'm still carrying it around, after all these years.
yeah, I’ve read Marshall Bush owned the security company for the towers and they malfunctioned, nothing like having your brother having your back…
There are so many layers just on that. And so many anomalies, just one I’ll use - birds damage planes in flight so they can’t go through steel, and if you find videos of buildings in war they don’t even look like that in the process, these fell like they were filled with dynamite one at a time..and since it’s such a big suitcase and this is my tribe I know you likely know all the other things that have been pointed out but I am always amazed the masses take the story of gobble degooo lunatic fringe bs and go on about their day. But they’ve used many ways to mk ultra people without actually ever having been to sri! lol 🥹
💔this is the most insulting destruction and manipulation of Our democracy imaginable. In fact it is diabolical beyond belief. If you think our forefathers toiled over our constitution just to diminish our democratic survival as a nation then I know you are all mistaken. Traitorous accusations implied here are beastly concocted narratives!!! What is integrity besides lies and misguided intentions? What indeed??
Part of the key to realizing that the official story is a lie, is the fact that the alleged plane crashes on 9/11/2001 would have had to violate the laws of physics in order to have been as reported and "documented" in the official story.
There is very informational commission on 9/11. I’m unable to share the it for some reason right now. But the plane that hit the pentagon is a good example of just one of the things that couldn’t have happened. The drop in altitude and sudden turn could not have happened. Many pilots have testified to that. So much more though.
It is easier for you to find for yourself than for us to re-type it for you. Look up 911 hearings and there are volumes of information. You can search an anything you are curious about. A fun one is the phone calls. Then move on to building 7. That’s a doozy.
all sorts of strange stuff going on, first of all, the place where Charlie was allegedly shot - was a CRIME SCENE and as such should be secured & kept just as it was at the time he was allegedly shot - additionally why no paramedic response, Charlie was carried away . . but to where? what was done by the local authorities to investigate a homicide? ? ? ? ? so many questions so few answers . . .
I know nothing about "Charlie's death", but in the case of bank accounting fraud, their 300-year-old method of wrapping the truth in one or more accounting lies has finally been exposed. [https://patcusack.substack.com/] Banks obscure the numerical accounting truth with verbal accounting lies to create the most powerful magical illusion: what appears to be "a loan of credit".
People are so mesmerised by the effect of this credit-lending illusion that they fail to discern these lies. Because we too willingly accept the results of the accounting truth (our new Credit Balances), we end up paying the penalty for not discerning the accounting lies wrapped around it, which alone let the bank impose unwarranted penalty clauses (the mortgage) and demand unjustified interest payments.
Deception alone creates the “appearance of a loan", and any competent accountant will agree that "Nobody can lend a liability!" Yet that is exactly what banks have been pretending to do for 300+ years because the Credit Balance a bank pretends to lend you is a bank liability and is never the bank’s to lend. When you hand over your signed promise to pay the bank (creating the initial Debit Balance), the bank is obliged to make its promise to pay you (creating the matching Credit Balance). Those promises are both “naked” promises, because no pre-existing assets are moved in that exchange.
The beauty of this discovery is that banks cannot hide their verbal "lending lies". To create the illusion of a loan, their lies must (and do) appear in writing in every new Loan Account statement, immediately below the line that says “Opening Balance => $0.00”. It is there to be seen, and when the deception is recognised, exposed, and corrected, the remaining truthful numbers alone describe the “naked truth”: that a mutual exchange of equally naked promises occurred, and that exchange established no debt.
So, let's teach others how to recognise those lies. I'm trying to do that on my Substack [linked above] and will welcome any additional explainers who might materialise as a result of this comment.
For me, there was such a flood of unreliable or false statements that it's hard to narrow it down to what matters and what's truly a lie v 'fog of war'.
I'm convinced that the fundamental story is actually a lie. The story: "He was assassinated by a 22 year old acting alone using his granpa's 30.06 from that location."
The narrative lie is that he was killed by "the left" for his staunch support of "Israel" and conservative values.
We know that's 100% false because he wasn't killed by millions of people, he was killed by someone pulling a trigger; blaming it on a whole political opposition is power dynamics.
I know who benefited, or attempted to benefit the most: Israel, JD Vance/Natcons, the President, and TPUSA/Erica Kirk.
It defies logic to think this was a left wing plot because it doesn't benefit anyone on the left.
He had turned on Israel & the President's policies, and if allowed to keep speaking he would taken the core support for the current and next White House away.
Well I think the shooter was probably groomed by CIA or FBI bad actors. But I don’t agree that he turned against the Presidents policies, implying that the President was involved in his death.
The President called Charlie Kirk personally on July 12th and told him to stop talking about Epstein. On his July 14th show, Charlie relayed that story and said "I'm going to trust my friends in the administration."
On July 15th, he backtracked and said "I meant I was done yesterday" and then talked about it more.
On July 16th, he did a whole segment on Epstein with a 10 point list of what the Administration needed to do - almost all of them are things the Administration has refused to do.
I don't have all of the videos in clean documentation yet, but at least as late as a August 21st he was contradicting the White House.
So, Charlie turning on the President's position on Epstein is just a fact, not an accusation. He also personally intervened to keep the Iran situation from being a full on war.
Saying that the President gained from his death isn't an accusation either, it's just a logical political assessment as a former political / campaign professional.
In investigating any murder, you would go down the list of those who had the most to gain. For most average murder victims, that would mean looking at those with life insurance policies or heirs. For one of the most consequential figures in American politics in 2025, it includes those who benefit from either his elimination or from the sympathetic outpouring to his elimination. I think the President is lower on that list than Netanyahu -- Charlie was an existential threat to Netanyahu's career and freedom.
However, in a first in our lifetimes, we have a FBI & DOJ director who believe they work for the President, so we have a clear conflict of interest.
Great research. Now the witch is troubling and is the description of your group. Find Jesus Christ and save your souls too not just your life. In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. I bind and cast into the abyss the demons of witchcraft in this group and every witch in the Democratic Party, Republican Party, banking industry. Governments across the world. They will be saved from this destructive rebellion of witchcraft. Amen.
So, how do we directly oppose these bans as well as get the unredacted names of the perpetrators, facilitators, & financial institutions? Will we have to wait for the 2026 elections; how can we move now?
I’m convinced that they were buying time since the day before the shutdown to doctor or clean the Epstein files.
My former boss, mentor is the lead parliamentarian expert in the House. He shut down the House a day before the actual government shutdown to avoid seating the 218th vote for the Epstein files. The House runs on a separate budget, so there was no reason for them to be out of session.
That’s desperation, and there had to be a reason besides mere delay.
Ethan excellent article. Thank you so much.
I’m aware wherever there is power there are also people hungry to gain it and hold it.
As soon as I noticed the elimination of Civics studies had become a complete war against our Department of Education, I realized knowledge had become the #1
enemy of the powerful and those who seek more power.
I see the US as an active crime scene - always has been, and always will be. Expect ongoing battles forever.So glad you’re on our team. 👍🏼
Even though, the electronic snooping by our government is nothing new as we were warned by Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor back in 2013, each of us are being threatened by a new McCarthyism for our beliefs. Before Snowden issued his warning, I knew this was happening as I had read an article that stated the big telecoms were funneling all of the internet traffic to huge government server storage farms. While they didn't specify in that article, what the data being collected was to be used for, having been in IT for 30 years at that time, I knew exactly why they were collecting it.
Knowing what I know, and even using all of the commercially available software to protect myself, I do know that all the VPNs, encryption, antivirus, and malware software cannot protect me from the ability of the government and BigTech to 'fingerprint' any device used on the internet.
I realize it's sort of silly to cling to my pseudonym, SpudLink, but hey, it's my security blanket, and I'm still carrying it around, after all these years.
Incredible information!
I’m not sure about much, but it seems like we don’t know the full 411 on 9-11.
The Dysfunctional, abusive Family has been the INSIDE JOB decades before 9/11
yeah, I’ve read Marshall Bush owned the security company for the towers and they malfunctioned, nothing like having your brother having your back…
There are so many layers just on that. And so many anomalies, just one I’ll use - birds damage planes in flight so they can’t go through steel, and if you find videos of buildings in war they don’t even look like that in the process, these fell like they were filled with dynamite one at a time..and since it’s such a big suitcase and this is my tribe I know you likely know all the other things that have been pointed out but I am always amazed the masses take the story of gobble degooo lunatic fringe bs and go on about their day. But they’ve used many ways to mk ultra people without actually ever having been to sri! lol 🥹
Marvin not Marshall Bush was on the board.
💔this is the most insulting destruction and manipulation of Our democracy imaginable. In fact it is diabolical beyond belief. If you think our forefathers toiled over our constitution just to diminish our democratic survival as a nation then I know you are all mistaken. Traitorous accusations implied here are beastly concocted narratives!!! What is integrity besides lies and misguided intentions? What indeed??
Part of the key to realizing that the official story is a lie, is the fact that the alleged plane crashes on 9/11/2001 would have had to violate the laws of physics in order to have been as reported and "documented" in the official story.
Please explain the physics so this elderly woman can understand what you are claiming. I am curious, but know absolutely nothing about physics.
There is very informational commission on 9/11. I’m unable to share the it for some reason right now. But the plane that hit the pentagon is a good example of just one of the things that couldn’t have happened. The drop in altitude and sudden turn could not have happened. Many pilots have testified to that. So much more though.
Bob ~ No reply addressed my request for a “law of physics” explanation.
It is easier for you to find for yourself than for us to re-type it for you. Look up 911 hearings and there are volumes of information. You can search an anything you are curious about. A fun one is the phone calls. Then move on to building 7. That’s a doozy.
That’s how I tackle fraud cases. Start with the lie. Don’t rest until my boots on their neck.
Do you see a fundamental lie in the Kirk assassination?
all sorts of strange stuff going on, first of all, the place where Charlie was allegedly shot - was a CRIME SCENE and as such should be secured & kept just as it was at the time he was allegedly shot - additionally why no paramedic response, Charlie was carried away . . but to where? what was done by the local authorities to investigate a homicide? ? ? ? ? so many questions so few answers . . .
Same here.
I know nothing about "Charlie's death", but in the case of bank accounting fraud, their 300-year-old method of wrapping the truth in one or more accounting lies has finally been exposed. [https://patcusack.substack.com/] Banks obscure the numerical accounting truth with verbal accounting lies to create the most powerful magical illusion: what appears to be "a loan of credit".
People are so mesmerised by the effect of this credit-lending illusion that they fail to discern these lies. Because we too willingly accept the results of the accounting truth (our new Credit Balances), we end up paying the penalty for not discerning the accounting lies wrapped around it, which alone let the bank impose unwarranted penalty clauses (the mortgage) and demand unjustified interest payments.
Deception alone creates the “appearance of a loan", and any competent accountant will agree that "Nobody can lend a liability!" Yet that is exactly what banks have been pretending to do for 300+ years because the Credit Balance a bank pretends to lend you is a bank liability and is never the bank’s to lend. When you hand over your signed promise to pay the bank (creating the initial Debit Balance), the bank is obliged to make its promise to pay you (creating the matching Credit Balance). Those promises are both “naked” promises, because no pre-existing assets are moved in that exchange.
The beauty of this discovery is that banks cannot hide their verbal "lending lies". To create the illusion of a loan, their lies must (and do) appear in writing in every new Loan Account statement, immediately below the line that says “Opening Balance => $0.00”. It is there to be seen, and when the deception is recognised, exposed, and corrected, the remaining truthful numbers alone describe the “naked truth”: that a mutual exchange of equally naked promises occurred, and that exchange established no debt.
So, let's teach others how to recognise those lies. I'm trying to do that on my Substack [linked above] and will welcome any additional explainers who might materialise as a result of this comment.
No, what?
I was curious if you saw one.
For me, there was such a flood of unreliable or false statements that it's hard to narrow it down to what matters and what's truly a lie v 'fog of war'.
I'm convinced that the fundamental story is actually a lie. The story: "He was assassinated by a 22 year old acting alone using his granpa's 30.06 from that location."
The narrative lie is that he was killed by "the left" for his staunch support of "Israel" and conservative values.
We know that's 100% false because he wasn't killed by millions of people, he was killed by someone pulling a trigger; blaming it on a whole political opposition is power dynamics.
I know who benefited, or attempted to benefit the most: Israel, JD Vance/Natcons, the President, and TPUSA/Erica Kirk.
It defies logic to think this was a left wing plot because it doesn't benefit anyone on the left.
He had turned on Israel & the President's policies, and if allowed to keep speaking he would taken the core support for the current and next White House away.
He was also demanding release of Epstein files, which would have made him very unpopular with Trump at the time.
Well I think the shooter was probably groomed by CIA or FBI bad actors. But I don’t agree that he turned against the Presidents policies, implying that the President was involved in his death.
The President called Charlie Kirk personally on July 12th and told him to stop talking about Epstein. On his July 14th show, Charlie relayed that story and said "I'm going to trust my friends in the administration."
On July 15th, he backtracked and said "I meant I was done yesterday" and then talked about it more.
On July 16th, he did a whole segment on Epstein with a 10 point list of what the Administration needed to do - almost all of them are things the Administration has refused to do.
I don't have all of the videos in clean documentation yet, but at least as late as a August 21st he was contradicting the White House.
So, Charlie turning on the President's position on Epstein is just a fact, not an accusation. He also personally intervened to keep the Iran situation from being a full on war.
Saying that the President gained from his death isn't an accusation either, it's just a logical political assessment as a former political / campaign professional.
In investigating any murder, you would go down the list of those who had the most to gain. For most average murder victims, that would mean looking at those with life insurance policies or heirs. For one of the most consequential figures in American politics in 2025, it includes those who benefit from either his elimination or from the sympathetic outpouring to his elimination. I think the President is lower on that list than Netanyahu -- Charlie was an existential threat to Netanyahu's career and freedom.
However, in a first in our lifetimes, we have a FBI & DOJ director who believe they work for the President, so we have a clear conflict of interest.
This is amazing!
Great research. Now the witch is troubling and is the description of your group. Find Jesus Christ and save your souls too not just your life. In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. I bind and cast into the abyss the demons of witchcraft in this group and every witch in the Democratic Party, Republican Party, banking industry. Governments across the world. They will be saved from this destructive rebellion of witchcraft. Amen.
now that's a story worth reading, like flipping that memory switch
So, how do we directly oppose these bans as well as get the unredacted names of the perpetrators, facilitators, & financial institutions? Will we have to wait for the 2026 elections; how can we move now?
“2001 enabled 2008.
2008 enabled 2013.
2013 enabled the post-truth collapse we’re living in now.”
What happened 2013??
Islam will Defeat All Of It ! You hold the Serpent Too Close To Your Throat ! Sunlight is the Best Disinfectant So you keep it in the Dark
Open it All out and tell the Truth and being out there we will know everything aw
WTF?