Oh great—one more reason not to get out of bed. You know, all of these money grabbing people would be able to get MORE money out of us peons if we had a life where we could be basically content and happy. A chicken in every pot kinda thing. Did they ever consider that? Most of us grunts down here would let y’all have as much as you want as long as we get a reasonable ordinary middle class existence, enough money not to be in abject debt because of outrageously expensive private health care, enough money to send our kids to a reasonably priced college or a trade school, enough to go on a 2-week vacation, own a modest home, be able to go to a ball game from time to time. We don’t want global power and dripping wealth and buildings with our names in them snd haute couture. We want a regular life, time with friends, kids whose futures look stable. Then we’d go to work, get our reasonable paycheck and let the oligarchs snd the uber wealthy do what they will. Isn’t there room for both of those scenarios?
The Turnip and his weeds are a rebirth of ancient greed. All or nothing... They will soon find just how far their insatiable gluttoney takes them. The worst part are the innocent bystanders will fall as well.
There’s a certain seduction in narratives that give the system a villain but take away its face. It turns something vast and impersonal into something almost mythological. An immortal machine, a ghost, an engine that feeds on its own design. It feels powerful because it simplifies complexity into intent.
But what’s actually more interesting is not the idea of control. It’s the persistence of structure. Systems don’t need to be perfectly designed to endure. They just need to be resilient enough to absorb pressure and adaptive enough to evolve when threatened. That often looks less like a master plan and more like a series of incentives compounding over time.
Markets operate on the same quiet principle. No single actor needs to orchestrate the outcome. The structure itself begins to guide behavior. If leverage is rewarded, more leverage appears. If opacity protects, opacity grows. Over time, the system starts to resemble intention even when it is simply responding to its own incentives.
What this piece captures well, even through its intensity, is that drift. The slow migration from human accountability toward abstraction. The more distance you place between action and consequence, the more durable the system becomes. Not because it is invincible, but because it becomes harder to localize blame. And anything that cannot be easily blamed tends to persist longer than it should.
The market parallel is almost uncomfortable. Everyone wants a single cause for a move, a clean narrative, a visible hand. In reality, most large outcomes are the result of accumulated pressures that no longer require a central actor. They just need participants willing to keep playing the same game.
And that is the part most people underestimate. Not the existence of the machine, but how easily people continue to operate within it, even when they believe they are fighting against it.
There is a certain seduction in your narrative, too—the comfort of believing the machine is a faceless weather event rather than a governed structure. It’s much easier to surrender to 'accumulated pressures' and 'compounding incentives' than to audit the specific boardrooms that designed them. You're right that the system relies on structural drift, but incentives don't write themselves. Algorithms have authors.
You make the assumption that the goal of the piece is to fight against the machine by trying to escape it. But the machine is just society. We aren't trying to operate outside of it in some mythological wilderness. The realization isn't that the machine shouldn't exist; it's that the current operators are extracting the foundation to sell the copper wire.
The objective was never to exit the machine. The objective is to walk into the control room and take the wheel back.
"You aren’t crazy for feeling like the system wants you to fail. It does. Nicholas Biddle proved that when the elite are threatened, they will gladly starve the populace to protect the machine."
Unless God of the worlds, ruler over all dominion, steps in, to stop these horrendous actions of the US govt; What was planned on Jekyll Island, and reinforced in Project 2025. The imprisoning, starving, and killing of the American people will come to past.
Greed & the false sense of power has always been an empires downfall, throughout history. It appears our doomes day is, just around the corner.
Next chapter: In 2026-28 the oligarchy devalued the dollar with a strategic conflict that constricted the world's oil supply. Using the ensuing economic crisis as an excuse for a radical restructuring disguised as a bailout, they created another shadow layer behind the Federal Reserve: an unofficial Crypto Bank. Using the language of "backing", they made it seem like the Fed was now being propped up by the new forms of currency. But in reality it was being further parasitized. The parasite eating the parasite was able to even more efficiently and obscurely funnel wealth from the real activities of real people to the digital vaults of unseen funds and conglomerates.
The new crypto "backing" of the Fed offered the powerful with a plethora of innovative tools for manipulating appreciation and depreciation. Different types of dollars could be sorted automatically with blockchain tech, so the poor received dollars that needed to be spent immediately or else they'd begin losing value, and the rich received dollars that automatically ballooned. The new financial infrastructure even allowed the shadowy vampire architects to target different types of spending with seamless precision. With no need for vast police forces or regulatory agents, they could flip a switch and make certain behaviors more expensive than others.
Traditional "government" became even more superfluous than before, serving only the role of periodically injecting violence to destabilize alternatives and generate fear of resisting. Pathways to change this infrastructure were deeply limited by the fact that no one person understood how the whole thing worked. With the actual math of the system running on AI, even the people in control didn't really understand HOW the lever they held enriched them - it just did. Unable to collectively comprehend the hell it had been dragged to, society was unable to dream of a way out.
I am confused perhaps, but I believe you may want to look at a case “Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward “. (1819). In his comprehensive opinion, Justice Marshall lays out several aspects of corporations, including immortality.
In his opinion, he initially defines a corporation as a “artificial being.” He calls them “intangible” and “invisible.” Further on, he refers to corporations as a “creature of law,” having only the abilities granted in its charter; it had no inherent powers. Yet it was the word “being” that was seized upon, even by Marshall himself. He goes on to discuss things like corporate immorality and other aspects that could be seen as contrary to his “creature of law” concept.
I'll be studying this for a while. Stunning information. We need to be teaching this in our schools
They don’t for a reason. Our public schools are government indoctrination centers.
I keep waiting to read something that is not factually true. You have nailed the history.
I like to think I am careful with this. My college education taught me in-depth media literacy skills.
Wowser!! You’re a gift never ever stop writing!! Truth always wins in the end…
Thank you for such a thorough truthful history LESSON. We need to know the past so we don’t let it keep happening
Wow! You did a thing! Really good research
....well...I am going to write a VERY strongly worded letter to my congressmen now. Hell, I'll email my senator too!
Incredible. The elite owe us taxpayers tens of trillions of dollars. Imagine our country if we had those funds all along.
I just Love You! 🥰
<3
Oh great—one more reason not to get out of bed. You know, all of these money grabbing people would be able to get MORE money out of us peons if we had a life where we could be basically content and happy. A chicken in every pot kinda thing. Did they ever consider that? Most of us grunts down here would let y’all have as much as you want as long as we get a reasonable ordinary middle class existence, enough money not to be in abject debt because of outrageously expensive private health care, enough money to send our kids to a reasonably priced college or a trade school, enough to go on a 2-week vacation, own a modest home, be able to go to a ball game from time to time. We don’t want global power and dripping wealth and buildings with our names in them snd haute couture. We want a regular life, time with friends, kids whose futures look stable. Then we’d go to work, get our reasonable paycheck and let the oligarchs snd the uber wealthy do what they will. Isn’t there room for both of those scenarios?
The Turnip and his weeds are a rebirth of ancient greed. All or nothing... They will soon find just how far their insatiable gluttoney takes them. The worst part are the innocent bystanders will fall as well.
Yes the incubator
There’s a certain seduction in narratives that give the system a villain but take away its face. It turns something vast and impersonal into something almost mythological. An immortal machine, a ghost, an engine that feeds on its own design. It feels powerful because it simplifies complexity into intent.
But what’s actually more interesting is not the idea of control. It’s the persistence of structure. Systems don’t need to be perfectly designed to endure. They just need to be resilient enough to absorb pressure and adaptive enough to evolve when threatened. That often looks less like a master plan and more like a series of incentives compounding over time.
Markets operate on the same quiet principle. No single actor needs to orchestrate the outcome. The structure itself begins to guide behavior. If leverage is rewarded, more leverage appears. If opacity protects, opacity grows. Over time, the system starts to resemble intention even when it is simply responding to its own incentives.
What this piece captures well, even through its intensity, is that drift. The slow migration from human accountability toward abstraction. The more distance you place between action and consequence, the more durable the system becomes. Not because it is invincible, but because it becomes harder to localize blame. And anything that cannot be easily blamed tends to persist longer than it should.
The market parallel is almost uncomfortable. Everyone wants a single cause for a move, a clean narrative, a visible hand. In reality, most large outcomes are the result of accumulated pressures that no longer require a central actor. They just need participants willing to keep playing the same game.
And that is the part most people underestimate. Not the existence of the machine, but how easily people continue to operate within it, even when they believe they are fighting against it.
There is a certain seduction in your narrative, too—the comfort of believing the machine is a faceless weather event rather than a governed structure. It’s much easier to surrender to 'accumulated pressures' and 'compounding incentives' than to audit the specific boardrooms that designed them. You're right that the system relies on structural drift, but incentives don't write themselves. Algorithms have authors.
You make the assumption that the goal of the piece is to fight against the machine by trying to escape it. But the machine is just society. We aren't trying to operate outside of it in some mythological wilderness. The realization isn't that the machine shouldn't exist; it's that the current operators are extracting the foundation to sell the copper wire.
The objective was never to exit the machine. The objective is to walk into the control room and take the wheel back.
"You aren’t crazy for feeling like the system wants you to fail. It does. Nicholas Biddle proved that when the elite are threatened, they will gladly starve the populace to protect the machine."
Unless God of the worlds, ruler over all dominion, steps in, to stop these horrendous actions of the US govt; What was planned on Jekyll Island, and reinforced in Project 2025. The imprisoning, starving, and killing of the American people will come to past.
Greed & the false sense of power has always been an empires downfall, throughout history. It appears our doomes day is, just around the corner.
Our doomsday is here. It’s called karma. Or you reap what you sow. Unfortunately this is the price we will all pay for being asleep.
Next chapter: In 2026-28 the oligarchy devalued the dollar with a strategic conflict that constricted the world's oil supply. Using the ensuing economic crisis as an excuse for a radical restructuring disguised as a bailout, they created another shadow layer behind the Federal Reserve: an unofficial Crypto Bank. Using the language of "backing", they made it seem like the Fed was now being propped up by the new forms of currency. But in reality it was being further parasitized. The parasite eating the parasite was able to even more efficiently and obscurely funnel wealth from the real activities of real people to the digital vaults of unseen funds and conglomerates.
The new crypto "backing" of the Fed offered the powerful with a plethora of innovative tools for manipulating appreciation and depreciation. Different types of dollars could be sorted automatically with blockchain tech, so the poor received dollars that needed to be spent immediately or else they'd begin losing value, and the rich received dollars that automatically ballooned. The new financial infrastructure even allowed the shadowy vampire architects to target different types of spending with seamless precision. With no need for vast police forces or regulatory agents, they could flip a switch and make certain behaviors more expensive than others.
Traditional "government" became even more superfluous than before, serving only the role of periodically injecting violence to destabilize alternatives and generate fear of resisting. Pathways to change this infrastructure were deeply limited by the fact that no one person understood how the whole thing worked. With the actual math of the system running on AI, even the people in control didn't really understand HOW the lever they held enriched them - it just did. Unable to collectively comprehend the hell it had been dragged to, society was unable to dream of a way out.
I am confused perhaps, but I believe you may want to look at a case “Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward “. (1819). In his comprehensive opinion, Justice Marshall lays out several aspects of corporations, including immortality.
In his opinion, he initially defines a corporation as a “artificial being.” He calls them “intangible” and “invisible.” Further on, he refers to corporations as a “creature of law,” having only the abilities granted in its charter; it had no inherent powers. Yet it was the word “being” that was seized upon, even by Marshall himself. He goes on to discuss things like corporate immorality and other aspects that could be seen as contrary to his “creature of law” concept.
No matter what, the Supreme Court solidified it in 2010 in Citizens United V. FEC! Unfettered spending to congressional control over industries!
I like the concept
The greatest country in the world and the greatest democracy a greatest promoter of freedom. Bullshit!!