13 Comments
User's avatar
Claudette Leece's avatar

The other day I was talking to someone who knows politics, and he said to me, “ you know regardless who is running on either side, either party, the money man supports both of them, and his well off friends, it’s just betting on a sure thing “, now I am not a newcomer to politics and when he said that, it hit me. They might wear different colors but the money behind them comes from the same folks. So no wonder they might have a few different policies, they are serving the same masters

Carol Tencza's avatar

And your birth certificate is owned by them b/c those banker's created it to keep the politicians happy and the "captured" enslaved. Yep, no sense voting - they are all rigged anyway and we are the losers no matter which side of the aisle gets chosen. We are the debtor no matter what cause the game is rigged to make sure we stay that way, at their pleasure. "You will own nothing and be very unhappy" b/c every time you put your signature on anything, they get to keep it. Gotta work smarter and get creative so we can at least know who we really are - they don't b/c they have ownership of that thing called a birth certificate and they get to sell it to the highest bidder of stocks and bonds. Get it? Bonds? Build your community where you now live; create your own "system" that by-passes them and their greed. Helps break it down over time - make it work so other's can make it work, too. We CAN do this; our children depend on us to do so. Unity is that necessity for life; learn their "tricks" so you can ignore them and build; create; support each other for a better tomorrow. Peace out.

Anthony's avatar

Yes! Sharp addition. And I agree with you. We need community and each other. Care is the foundation that lasts. And it doesn’t scale, it requires proximity and mutuality. “Bond”, that’s one I’ve missed in my previous linguistic analysis. That’s juicy. I already knew our bonds, is the leverage for these anti social systems. Now it reads literal.

Madeleine Sinor's avatar

How to undo fragment steal and destroy people families communities take their good will , demolish their good faith dealing , their decades of hardwork , This descis a malevolent force to be slayed This is our work

Anthony's avatar

This remind me of something someone said to me once that’s made a lot of sense of how to approach the injustice of what many of us were born into. It’s not our fault, but it is our responsibility. And also, we didn’t individually create this, there is a spectrum of culpability, and we wont individually solve this and some have greater leverage than others.

It’s our work. And it begins right where we are. And that looks like recognizing where we stop seeing individual living beings and start seeing labels, groups, agentless rhetoric disowning responsibility.

Claudette Leece's avatar

I don’t think those things enter their minds, their masters the lobbyists, the dairy cartels, the ones who own their souls , write the cheques are all that concerns them. Otherwise why would you go into politics. The doing good for your voters was debunked a long time ago

Claudette Leece's avatar

Great read that’s why I believe over the years people have lost faith in voting, how much of the promises are kept, we can see that federally and provincially now

Anthony's avatar

Thank you for reading. There have been many many broken promises. And worse is seeing that even when caught legally, the consequence is generally inconsequential to the bad actors.

I find that the system itself is running as it was incentivized. There’s the layer of what they claim and then the layer of statute and “law”.

Many people think something broke, my trace of history and pure arithmetic is this is the design and has been repeatedly, at least since the emergence of writing where a symbol can stand in for a body and actually be treated as more real than flesh and blood

Claudette Leece's avatar

What would shock people even more because only a handful of nerds who study history, and history books in Canada leave out a lot of facts that make Canada look bad instead of the sweet , docile kind country we have been brainwashed to believe, Canada had an evil past. The globalist destroyed and split the big land mass into the Indian continent, a split on the Irish land mass , they are destroying the European Union, they are destroying the Uk, and now they will destroy Canada. And another historian who studies Canada and the U.S. has said there will be conflict between Canada and the US, started by Canada and Canada is going to pay a huge price. Another reason for AB to get out of Canada. How many know Lincoln’s assasination was orchestrated by Canada and the evil city of London. Most of the civil war was started and led by Canada , World War Two with Sir William Stephenson with the Canadian intelligence services, setting up things in Canada and Bermuda, and at one time controlling US intelligence despite Rosevelt’s efforts to stop it. And when President Trump states Canada is a danger to the U.S. because along with its ties to the City of London and the globalists it is. And now with the ever flow of drugs and being in bed with China, and Canada tried to destroy the communication cables in the Arctic , so if they want to find themselves pushed out of the Arctic keep it up Canada. You better start building ice cutter fleets, which can take up o at least six years really fast because Russia and the U.S. would be happy to join forces and squeeze you out. Carneys playing a very dangerous game, his belief the City of Londons got their back and they can do what they want is sorely mistaken. President Trump, XI and President Putin are meeting soon and I am pretty sure they aren’t trading pictures of their family. They are probably discussing what ARC role will be and which countries will be under whose umbrella, but maybe by then Albertans will be out of Canada the best thing for that province

Bruce Wales's avatar

Intriguing. Plans within plans. Strategy to disarm, keep impotent, and records, if any, un-openable.

Anthony's avatar

Thank you for reading. And that’s close. The correction is make is “in-openable”. They are available. There are ample records of these strategies being deployed with relatively minimal resistance or no serious consequence when caught.

The key is to make the inactionable.

For example, you push the Bradley Amendment to its bitter end and ask for evidence it serves its stated purpose, especially in light of their own account and reports of the harm at the tail of enforcement.

You’ll get something close to a rational-basis review for economic and social legislation, and the cleanest modern statement is FCC v. Beach Communications, 508 U.S. 307 (1993). Justice Thomas, for a unanimous Court:

“a legislative choice is not subject to courtroom fact-finding and may be based on rational speculation unsupported by evidence or empirical data.”

508 U.S. at 315.

SwtP08's avatar

Rob Peter to pay Paul. Ain't nothing like getting played.

ErnestineOperator's avatar

why act as if this was a conversation w/someone? You lost me right after world bank bc its so unbelievable that such a convo took place & you remembered every word of it. If its just the format u wanted to use you shouldve said that.