19 Comments
User's avatar
John Michael's avatar

Only now Ethan, are they starting to mention the connection to 9/11, only now! That was the first article of yours that I read. I’m almost 70 and sometimes, actually a lot, I get thrown by the language. You represent the folks that are younger and have the mind of gamers, they know the lingo. I’ve told you this before and I’ll say it again. You are amazing! Brilliant! Keep pushing back on them when they push. I love the way you defend yourself, again, brilliant.

Meredith's avatar

John , I feel exactly the same as you. I am 80 and consider myself fairly educated but I poured over the writings in silence and sought no distractions as I tried to assimilate the enormity of the contents, and did understand I think the “ meat” of the revelation ! My question is which is probably a stupid one : the entities involved in the 9/11 attacks were instruments hired by US with Saudi supplying the actors ? Pardon the question.

Lisa LaBar's avatar

This is a definite masterpiece. Thank you for all of your time, effort, dedication, and hard work. This truly seems to wrap everything up, with a nice little bow! 💝

Meredith's avatar

I totally agree. You are a master Ethan , at presenting this evidence that truly explains the phenomenon we have observed over years but I for one had no clear understanding what was happening and the “WHY”? It is enlightening and very disturbing. Thank you

Dave's avatar

I’m highly technical but have no idea what you’re talking about.

Martin white's avatar

I agree, the description is full of analogies but no clear definition of objective. Very vague.

Meredith's avatar

I am sorry. I would not describe Ethan’s dissertation as “ vague “ in any way. The message seem succinct to me. Explanation repeated in some cases more than once with different verbiage I thought so better chance of comprehending ?

Dave's avatar

Maybe that’s the intent 🤷‍♂️

User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 18
Comment removed
Dave's avatar

Dude you’re right. I’m just dumb. My bad

John Michael's avatar

No you’re not David. He’s hard I know. I save lives for a living, I’m no dummy. This guy is brilliant . Would it not be wild if he represented the faction that misses things because they are too flexible? He’s linear, factual and strict. It’s hard for some of us. I trust him.

Meredith's avatar

Me too. I trust his brilliancy even though I find the substance so challenging to follow. But again I am old and mind I realize more limited than I cared to admit !🤭

Dave's avatar

I can’t deny that the post didn’t capture my attention. Definitely a lot of interesting concepts/designs in there. Also I do love a humility check every now and then 😜

User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 18
Comment removed
Dave's avatar

I don’t know what’s real anymore 😂

Dave's avatar

Btw i’m not trying to dump on your article - i think you clearly put a LOT of effort into it. I read the entire post hoping to latch onto some kind of concept that would tie it together for me. If this is meant for the 2% of genius’s out there and I landed here by mistake then the Substack algo is trash (neither of our problems). Mind you, I’m still interested in what you built bc I love learning new things lol.

Arlequín's avatar

Wow, that's original. I like it. Hahaha

Lisa Lindberg's avatar

I just happened upon this feed and not very tech savvy. Great with computers in the office world, but not much beyond that. But it seems like it’s a worthwhile endeavor to participate in.

Muvnngruvn's avatar

I got to the Living Story book and I click on the Flint incident but it took me to today’s Substack page/post. Now I’m lost. Am in my late 60’s, the terminology you use is foreign to me, but I was fascinated by the first part of the Living Storybook. Just came across your page a few weeks ago and you have my interest and attention! I look forward to reading more, and figuring out what this is all about.

Jane Gray's avatar

I am not aware of this & I am not

Interested. Mistake in messaging

I assume.